The first four options 
						include lifting the GST to 15 per cent, raising $32.5 
						billion; lifting the GST to 12.5 per cent and expanding 
						the base to include all food and non-alcoholic drinks, 
						raising $25 billion; and raising the Medicare Levy from 
						2 per cent to 4 per cent in one hit, which would raise 
						$15 billion. The fourth, and most radical option would 
						be to raise the GST to 15 per cent, expanding it to 
						include food and non-alcoholic drinks, water and 
						sewerage. This would raise $45 billion annually. 
						
						
						
						The second set of four 
						other options being considered are expanding the GST 
						base to include health services; including education 
						services; introducing a GST-equivalent financial sector 
						tax; and raising the Medicare Levy to 4 per cent over 
						eight years. 
						
						In 2014, it was estimated 
						that extending the GST to health, education services and 
						introducing a financial sector tax would each raise 
						about $4 billion annually if implemented. 
						
						The Turnbull government 
						has already indicated, however, that health and 
						education are likely to be exempt from any GST changes, 
						whereas fresh food and financial services are considered 
						fair game. 
						
						The paper also hints at 
						the difficult public debate that will accompany any rise 
						to the consumption tax, warning "public commitments 
						about which households will be fully compensated should 
						be avoided" because "making commitments now risks 
						over-compensation for households". 
						
						Offsetting GST price rises 
						for households earning less than $100,000, and half of 
						the price rises for households earning less than 
						$155,000, would use "at least" half the extra GST 
						revenue, it states. 
						
						The $15 billion that would 
						be raised by increasing the Medicare Levy, without 
						assistance for households, is about the same amount left 
						over if the GST is increased to 15 per cent and 
						households are compensated. 
						
						That means, in effect, 
						some people would be worse off under a Medicare Levy 
						rise than a straight increase in the GST. 
						
						The increases in pensions, 
						family payments, concessions for seniors and a rise in 
						the low income tax offset were used to compensate 
						households after the introduction of the carbon tax in 
						2010-11 and served as a "useful example of the form that 
						compensation could take for a change in the GST". 
						
						Treasurer Scott Morrison 
						and his state counterparts will meet on Thursday in 
						Sydney, the day before the leaders meeting, with reforms 
						to state taxes to dominate discussions. 
						
						Last week, Mr Morrison 
						played down the significance of the Treasury modelling, 
						which has not been released, arguing it had been "done 
						based on the request from the states". 
						
						Mr Morrison said on Monday 
						the "idea that we should be raising taxes to pay for 
						higher levels of expenditure" by the states did not 
						appeal to him, or the Prime Minister. 
						
						Mr Shorten said on 
						Tuesday: "I don't believe that the case has been made 
						that Australia, in order to make sure that we are a 
						successful, fair country needs to have a GST where you 
						put everything up to 15 per cent". 
						
						Mr Costello wrote for News 
						Corp that "if the Coalition goes ahead with that 
						proposal [a rise to 15 per cent], you can put down the 
						glasses and stop worrying about other policies ... it 
						will swamp everything". 
						
						Mr Shorten said he didn't 
						always agree with Mr Costello "but he is stating the 
						obvious, isn't he? Putting up a GST to 15 per cent, it's 
						lazy". 
						
						NSW and South Australia 
						have led the case, among the states, in pushing for a 
						GST rise.
							
						
						
						Source:: 
						 The Sydney Morning Herald, dated 08/12/2015.